Komagata Maru Incident, 1914

Written By: Brijesh Singh | Updated: May 14, 2025, 10:39 am IST | Category: Indian National Movement | Views: 1010 views

Advertisement

The Komagata Maru Incident of 1914 stands as a powerful symbol of racial exclusion, colonial injustice, and the emerging resistance by Indians against British imperialism. This episode—often overshadowed in mainstream colonial histories—played a significant role in galvanizing political consciousness among Indians, both at home and abroad. It exposed the deep contradictions within the British Empire’s claims of justice and equality for its colonial subjects and helped sow the seeds of revolutionary fervor that would fuel India’s struggle for independence.

Background: Colonial Migration and Racist Immigration Laws

In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, a significant number of Indians, particularly Sikhs from Punjab, migrated to British colonies like Canada, Australia, and South Africa in search of better economic opportunities. These migrants, subjects of the British Crown, assumed they had the right to settle anywhere within the Empire.

However, the rise of racial nationalism and economic protectionism in settler colonies like Canada led to the implementation of restrictive immigration laws aimed at preserving the “white” character of these nations. A key regulation was the 1908 Canadian “Continuous Journey Regulation,” which required that immigrants arrive by a direct journey from their country of origin—a logistical impossibility for ships from India, as there were no direct steamship lines between India and Canada.

Continuous Journey Regulation: The 1908 Canadian “Continuous Journey Regulation” was a discriminatory immigration law aimed at curbing Indian migration to Canada. It required that immigrants arrive directly from their country of origin without any stopovers—a condition nearly impossible for ships from India, which had no direct sailings to Canada. This regulation effectively excluded Indian migrants, despite their status as British subjects.

This discriminatory policy laid the foundation for the Komagata Maru incident.

The Voyage of the Komagata Maru

SS Komagata Maru Incident

SS Komagata Maru in April 1914. The person standing in front is Gurdit Singh along with his son.

On April 4, 1914, the SS Komagata Maru, a Japanese steam ship (the SS in Komagata Maru stands for steam ship), left Hong Kong carrying 376 passengers, including 340 Sikhs, 24 Muslims, and 12 Hindus, all British Indian subjects. The ship was chartered by Gurdit Singh, a Sikh entrepreneur and political activist based in Singapore. His intent was not only to challenge the racist immigration laws but also to assert the rights of Indians as equal citizens of the British Empire.

“We are British citizens and we consider we have a right to visit any part of the Empire,” said organizer Gurdit Singh.

The ship traveled from Hong Kong via Shanghai and Yokohama, eventually reaching Vancouver, British Columbia, on May 23, 1914. Upon arrival, Canadian immigration authorities refused to let the passengers disembark, citing the Continuous Journey Regulation and a $200 cash requirement that most passengers could not meet.

Standoff in Vancouver, Canada

The Komagata Maru remained anchored in Vancouver’s Burrard Inlet for nearly two months. During this period, a legal and political battle unfolded between the passengers, local South Asian activists (notably members of the Khalsa Diwan Society), and Canadian authorities.

Lawyer J. Edward Bird filed a habeas corpus petition on behalf of the passengers, but the British Columbia Court of Appeal upheld the federal government’s decision to deny entry. The Canadian press and political elite portrayed the passengers as dangerous agitators and potential revolutionaries, reinforcing xenophobic fears.

In the meantime, the passengers suffered extreme hardships aboard the ship—limited access to food, water, and medical care. Canadian authorities even attempted to forcibly remove the ship, but met with resistance.

Finally, under pressure, the Canadian government provided provisions and ordered the ship to leave Canadian waters. On July 23, 1914, after 62 days, the Komagata Maru was forced to leave Vancouver harbor and return to Hong Kong and was escorted out by the HMCS Rainbow.

Return to India and Tragedy at Budge Budge, near Calcutta

The Komagata Maru sailed back to Asia, stopping briefly in Japan and then finally docking at Budge Budge, near Calcutta (now Kolkata), on September 27, 1914. Upon arrival, British Indian authorities, already wary of revolutionary activities and suspecting links with the Ghadar Party, attempted to arrest Gurdit Singh and several other passengers.

What followed was a violent clash between the passengers and British troops. Official reports stated that 19 passengers were killed, and many others were wounded or arrested. Gurdit Singh escaped and remained underground for several years before surrendering in 1922.

Gurdit Singh: A Revolutionary Behind the Komagata Maru Incident

Gurdit Singh related to SS Komagata Maru incident

Gurdit Singh (1860–1954) was a prominent Sikh entrepreneur, political activist, and freedom fighter whose name became forever linked with the Komagata Maru incident of 1914. Born in Punjab during British colonial rule, he later moved to Southeast Asia, where he became a successful businessman in Singapore. Deeply moved by the racial discrimination faced by Indians in British colonies, Singh emerged as a vocal critic of exclusionary immigration laws, particularly in Canada.

In 1914, Gurdit Singh chartered the Japanese steamship Komagata Maru to challenge Canada’s racist immigration policy—the “Continuous Journey Regulation” of 1908. The ship carried 376 Indian passengers, mostly Sikhs, from Hong Kong to Vancouver, where they were denied entry. Singh’s mission was not merely about migration but a broader assertion of the rights of Indians as equal citizens of the British Empire.

Following the ship’s forced return to India and the violent confrontation at Budge Budge near Calcutta, Singh went underground to evade arrest. He resurfaced and surrendered to authorities in 1922, spending several years in prison. Throughout his life, Gurdit Singh remained a symbol of defiance against colonial injustice. He later chronicled the incident in his book “Voyage of Komagata Maru or India’s Slavery Abroad, preserving this crucial chapter in India’s struggle for dignity and independence.

Impact on the Indian National Movement

The Komagata Maru incident became a rallying cry for Indian nationalists and revolutionaries. Its impact was multifaceted:

Rise of Revolutionary Nationalism: The Ghadar Party, based in the United States and Canada, used the incident as evidence of British duplicity. The party’s publications, such as Ghadar newspaper, widely disseminated the story to mobilize Indians for armed revolt against colonial rule.

Strengthening of Diaspora Nationalism: The incident radicalized many members of the Indian diaspora. It galvanized anti-colonial movements in North America, encouraging the view that peaceful assimilation into the Empire was impossible without full independence.

Symbol of Colonial Oppression: For Indian leaders such as Mahatma Gandhi, the episode underscored the hypocrisy of imperial claims of justice and fairness. Gandhi, while in South Africa at the time, followed the case closely and used it in his critique of British policies.

Influence on Political Strategy: The repression following the incident showed how the British were willing to use force to suppress dissent. It prompted Indian leaders to reconsider strategies—moving from moderate petitions to more assertive forms of protest and civil disobedience.

Legacy and Commemoration

The Komagata Maru incident has gained renewed attention in recent decades as part of efforts to confront the legacies of colonialism and racism. In 2008, the Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper issued a formal apology for the incident. In 2016, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau delivered a formal apology in the House of Commons, calling the incident “a stain on Canada’s history.”

In India, memorials exist in Budge Budge, and the story is taught in academic curricula as a pivotal moment of resistance against both racial exclusion and imperial oppression.

Conclusion

The Komagata Maru incident was more than a localized immigration dispute; it was a global moment in the history of anti-colonial resistance. It highlighted the interconnectedness of the Indian freedom struggle with diaspora activism, revealed the inherent racial and imperial hierarchies of the British Empire, and became a lasting symbol of injustice and defiance. As such, it deserves a central place in the historical narrative of India’s march toward independence.

Also read: Amritsar and the Komagata Maru Incident


Previous Years Questions (PYQs) and Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) Related to the Komagata Maru incident

UPSC Civil Services Preliminary Exam, 2014

1. The Komagata Maru incident is related to:

(a) Revolt of Indian soldiers in Canada

(b) The denial of entry to Indian immigrants in Canada

(c) Indian trade blockade in Burma

(d) Naval mutiny of Indian sailors

Click Here to See Answer

Answer: (b) The denial of entry to Indian immigrants in Canada

SSC CGL (Combined Graduate Level), 2017

2. The Komagata Maru was a:

(a) Warship used by the British

(b) Japanese ship carrying Indian immigrants to Canada

(c) British merchant ship sunk during World War I

(d) Cargo ship used in the Non-Cooperation Movement

Click Here to See Answer

Answer: (b) Japanese ship carrying Indian immigrants to Canada

Punjab PCS (PPSC), 2015

Himachal Pradesh PSC (HPPSC), 2018

3. The Komagata Maru incident occurred in the year:

(a) 1913

(b) 1914

(c) 1915

(d) 1916

Click Here to See Answer

Answer: (b) 1914

UPSC CDS (Combined Defence Services), 2016

4. Who was the leader of the passengers on board the Komagata Maru?

(a) Rash Behari Bose

(b) Lala Har Dayal

(c) Gurdit Singh

(d) Baba Gurmukh Singh

Click Here to See Answer

Answer: (c) Gurdit Singh

SSC CHSL (Combined Higher Secondary Level), 2019

5. The Komagata Maru ship was turned away from the port of:

(a) Vancouver

(b) Singapore

(c) Hong Kong

(d) San Francisco

Click Here to See Answer

Answer: (a) Vancouver

UPSC CAPF (Central Armed Police Forces), 2020

6. What was the primary reason behind the Komagata Maru incident?

(a) British suspicion of the Ghadar Party

(b) Racial discrimination and immigration laws in Canada

(c) Mutiny of Indian soldiers

(d) Arrest of Indian revolutionaries abroad

Click Here to See Answer

Answer: (b) Racial discrimination and immigration laws in Canada

West Bengal PSC (WBPSC), 2016

Bihar PCS (BPSC), 2019

7. On return to India, the passengers of Komagata Maru faced:

(a) Grand welcome by the national leaders

(b) Imprisonment by the British in Bombay

(c) Police firing at Budge Budge, Calcutta

(d) Deportation to Andaman Islands

Click Here to See Answer

Answer: (c) Police firing at Budge Budge, Calcutta

Rajasthan PCS (RPSC), 2021

8. The Komagata Maru incident had links with which of the following movements?

(a) Khilafat Movement

(b) Ghadar Movement

(c) Swadeshi Movement

(d) Civil Disobedience Movement

Click Here to See Answer

Answer: (b) Ghadar Movement

9. From which place did the Komagata Maru start its journey to Canada?

(a) Singapore

(b) Bombay

(c) British Hong Kong

(d) Calcutta

Click Here to See Answer

Answer: (c) British Hong Kong

10. The Komagata Maru incident occurred in:

(a) 1910

(b) 1912

(c) 1914

(d) 1916

Click Here to See Answer

Answer: (c) 1914

11. The Komagata Maru incident was one of the reasons for the fuelling of which movement?

(a) Non-Cooperation Movement

(b) Khilafat Movement

(c) Ghadar Movement

(d) Swadeshi Movement

Click Here to See Answer

Answer: (c) Ghadar Movement

12. Consider the following statements:

1. The Komagata Maru was a steamship built in Japan.

2. The Komagata Maru had a capacity of 100 passengers.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

(a) 1 only

(b) 2 only

(c) Both 1 and 2

(d) Neither 1 nor 2

Click Here to See Answer

Answer: (a) 1 only

Explanation: SS Komagata Maru was a cargo steam ship. It was hired to carry passengers. The ship carried 376 passengers.

13. With reference to Indian Modern History, consider the following events:

1. Komagata Maru Incident

2. Pacific Coast Hindustan Association founded

3. Gandhi returned to India from South Africa

What is the correct chronological order of the above events?

(a) 1 – 2 – 3

(b) 2 – 1 – 3

(c) 2 – 3 – 1

(d) 1 – 3 – 2

Click Here to See Answer

Answer: (b) 2 – 1 – 3

Explanation: The Pacific Coast Hindustan Association, later known as the Ghadar Party, was founded in 1913 in San Francisco, USA, by Lala Hardayal and Sohan Singh Bhakna.

Mahatma Gandhi returned to India from South Africa on January 9, 1915.


Short Answer Questions (SAQs) Related to Komagata Maru Incident

Question 1: What was the Komagata Maru Incident?

Answer: The Komagata Maru Incident occurred in 1914 when a Japanese steamship, Komagata Maru, carrying 376 Indian passengers (mostly Sikhs), was denied entry into Canada at the port of Vancouver due to discriminatory immigration laws. After two months of standoff, the ship was forced to return to India, where British authorities opened fire at Budge Budge port near Calcutta, killing several passengers. The incident exposed colonial racial policies and fueled revolutionary sentiment in India.

Question 2: Who was Gurdit Singh in the context of the Komagata Maru Incident?

Answer: Gurdit Singh was a Sikh entrepreneur and political activist who chartered the Komagata Maru in 1914 to challenge Canada’s racist immigration laws. He led the group of Indian immigrants aboard the ship and became a symbol of resistance against colonial discrimination. His actions played a role in inspiring the Ghadar Movement.

Question 3: Why was the Komagata Maru ship denied entry into Canada?

Answer: The ship was denied entry due to Canada’s racist immigration policy at the time, particularly the “Continuous Journey Regulation,” which effectively barred Indian immigrants by requiring them to travel directly from their country of origin without a stopover. Since the ship had originated from British Hong Kong, the Canadian authorities used this law to refuse entry.

Question 4: What happened to the passengers of the Komagata Maru upon their return to India?

Answer: Upon their return to India, the passengers were stopped by British authorities at Budge Budge port near Calcutta. A confrontation ensued, leading to police firing in which 19 passengers were killed and many were arrested. The rest were either detained or kept under surveillance.


Descriptive Questions Related to Komagata Maru Incident

Question 1: Discuss the significance of the Komagata Maru Incident in the Indian freedom struggle.

Answer: The Komagata Maru Incident was a turning point in India’s freedom struggle. It highlighted the racial discrimination faced by Indians abroad under British imperialism. The ship’s rejection by Canadian authorities and the subsequent killing of passengers in India exposed the duplicity of colonial governance. The incident ignited anger and resentment among Indians, especially Punjabis, and strengthened anti-British sentiments. It also became a catalyst for the rise of revolutionary movements like the Ghadar Party. The event demonstrated the interconnectedness of Indian nationalist movements with global events, and the growing assertion of overseas Indians in the freedom movement.

Question 2: Analyze how the Komagata Maru Incident influenced the Ghadar Movement.

Answer: The Komagata Maru Incident served as a direct stimulus for the Ghadar Movement. The humiliation of Indian passengers and the killing of returnees in Calcutta angered Indian expatriates, particularly in North America. Members of the Ghadar Party used the incident to mobilize support, portraying it as evidence of the British Empire’s oppressive nature. It fueled revolutionary fervor and inspired many Indian youth to join the movement for armed rebellion against the British. Pamphlets, speeches, and propaganda centered around the Komagata Maru were widely circulated by Ghadar activists to galvanize support for India’s liberation.

Question 3: Evaluate the impact of the Komagata Maru Incident on Indo-Canadian relations during the early 20th century.

Answer: The Komagata Maru Incident strained Indo-Canadian relations in the early 20th century. It exposed Canada’s discriminatory immigration laws, leading to protests by the Indian diaspora and global criticism. While the Canadian government initially maintained its stance, the incident sowed the seeds for future policy reforms and better treatment of immigrants. It also alerted Canadian authorities to rising Indian nationalism and led to stricter surveillance of Indian immigrants. In the long term, it encouraged dialogue on multiculturalism, contributing to Canada’s eventual shift toward more inclusive immigration policies.

Question 4: Examine the role of racial discrimination in the Komagata Maru Incident and its aftermath.

Answer: Racial discrimination was central to the Komagata Maru Incident. The Canadian immigration laws, such as the “Continuous Journey Regulation,” were crafted to target and exclude Asians, particularly Indians. Despite being British subjects, the Indian passengers were denied entry solely based on race. The policy revealed a contradiction in the British Empire’s claims of equality. The violent reception of the returnees in India further underscored the systemic racism embedded in colonial governance. The incident galvanized anti-colonial movements, uniting Indians across class and caste lines against imperial injustice.

Advertisement

Avatar for Brijesh SinghWritten By: Brijesh Singh

Brijesh Singh has been providing guidance to various aspirants for the last two decades across diverse forums and institutes. He has also authored four books for UPSC and State Civil Services aspirants. Among his authored works is the widely acclaimed "Comprehensive Modern Indian History" published by S. Chand. The book is highly recommended for aspirants and is readily available in online stores like Amazon, Flipkart, and various local bookstores. Brijesh holds diverse academic interests and is a postgraduate in History, Computers, and Management Certificate from IIM Indore. Apart from being UGC NET qualified, he has keen interest in writing articles and blogs.

See all articles by Brijesh Singh

Related Stories

Women in the Quit India Movement of 1942

July 17, 2025  |  352 views

The Role of Women in the Quit India Movement of 1942: A Historical and Gendered Perspective

The Quit India Movement, launched by Mahatma Gandhi on 8 August 1942, marked a turning point in India’s freedom struggle.  …

Savitribai Phule 2

July 2, 2025  |  240 views

Savitribai Phule: The Firebrand Catalyst of Social Awakening in 19th Century India

In the dusty lanes of 19th-century Maharashtra, where caste orthodoxy and gendered silence reigned supreme, Savitribai Phule carved pathways for  …

All India Forward Bloc 1939

June 29, 2025  |  750 views

The All India Forward Bloc: A Historical and Analytical Study

The All India Forward Bloc (AIFB), founded by Subhas Chandra Bose in 1939, represents a significant ideological and strategic shift  …

non-cooperation-movement (1)

May 27, 2025  |  729 views

Non-Cooperation Movement and Swaraj

Previous Year Questions: This question has been asked in the UPSC Civil Services Exam 2025 – Prelims – General Studies  …

non-cooperation-movement

May 26, 2025  |  662 views

Non-Cooperation Movement and Non-Cooperation Programmes

Previous Year Questions: This question has been asked in the UPSC Civil Services Exam 2025 – Prelims – General Studies  …

raja ram mohan roy

May 26, 2025  |  791 views

Raja Ram Mohan Roy and traditional philosophical systems of the East

Previous Year Questions: This question has been asked in the UPSC Civil Services Exam 2025 – Prelims – General Studies  …

self respect movement by periyar

May 26, 2025  |  696 views

Self-Respect Movement by Periyar

Previous Year Questions: This question has been asked in the UPSC Civil Services Exam 2025 – Prelims – General Studies  …

poona pact 1932

May 26, 2025  |  1341 views

The Poona Pact 1932: A Turning Point in India’s Social and Political Struggle

The Poona Pact 1932 was a landmark agreement in the history of India’s freedom movement, marking a critical intersection between  …

poona pact 1932

May 26, 2025  |  629 views

Poona Pact 1932 and upliftment of ‘Harijans’

Previous Year Questions: This question has been asked in the UPSC Civil Services Exam 2025 – Prelims – General Studies  …

madan mohan malaviya stamp

May 26, 2025  |  1772 views

Legal defence to the people arrested in the aftermath of Chauri Chaura incident

Previous Year Questions: This question has been asked in the UPSC Civil Services Exam 2025 – Prelims – General Studies  …