Act of Settlement 1781 or Declaratory Act of 1781

The Act of Settlement 1781, also known as the Declaratory Act of 1781, was a significant piece of legislation passed by the British Parliament to resolve conflicts and ambiguities regarding the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court established in Calcutta under the Regulating Act of 1773. This Act aimed to address the challenges posed by the overlapping authority of the Supreme Court and the East India Company’s administration in India.

Table of Contents

1 Background of the Act of Settlement 1781
- 1.1 Objectives of the Act of Settlement 1781
2 Key Provisions of the Act of Settlement 1781
- 2.1 Significance of the Act of Settlement 1781
- 2.2 Limitations of the Act of Settlement 1781
3 Major Acts Passed during the British Period (1773-1947)

Background of the Act of Settlement 1781

The Regulating Act of 1773 established the Supreme Court in Calcutta, but its jurisdiction and powers were vaguely defined.
The court frequently clashed with the East India Company’s council and local administration over authority and legal matters.
These jurisdictional disputes created confusion and resentment among both British officials and Indian subjects, as the court often imposed English legal principles on Indian customs and practices.
The most infamous conflict arose during the Patna Case (1779) and the imprisonment of Raja Nand Kumar, which exposed the gaps in the judicial framework.

Objectives of the Act of Settlement 1781

The Act of Settlement sought to:

Clarify the jurisdiction and powers of the Supreme Court.
Resolve conflicts between the Supreme Court and the Governor-General’s Council.
Protect the rights and privileges of Indian subjects from the arbitrary use of English legal principles.
Ensure the smooth functioning of the East India Company’s administration.

Key Provisions of the Act of Settlement 1781

Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court: The Act limited the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to the town of Calcutta and excluded the Company’s revenue matters and actions performed by the Governor-General and his council in their official capacity. The court was barred from interfering in the collection of revenue or other official administrative actions of the Company.
Protection for Indian Subjects: Indian zamindars, revenue collectors, and company officials acting in their official capacity were granted immunity from the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, provided they followed the established laws and customs.
Native Laws and Customs: The Act directed the Supreme Court to consider the personal laws of Hindus and Muslims while adjudicating disputes involving these communities.
Court of Appeal: The Governor-General and Council were authorized to act as a court of appeal in civil cases, further curtailing the Supreme Court’s authority.
Codification of Law: The Act emphasized the application of Indian laws and customs in legal disputes involving Indian subjects, thereby reducing the imposition of English law.

Significance of the Act of Settlement 1781

Judicial Reforms: The Act streamlined the functioning of the judiciary and reduced jurisdictional conflicts between the Supreme Court and the Company’s administration.
Protection of Indian Rights: By recognizing Indian customs and laws, the Act safeguarded the cultural and legal traditions of the Indian population.
Strengthened Company’s Control: It reinforced the East India Company’s administrative authority by restricting judicial interference in revenue and administrative matters.

Limitations of the Act of Settlement 1781

Partial Reforms: The Act addressed jurisdictional conflicts but did not entirely resolve the complex relationship between the judiciary and the executive.
Continued Friction: Despite the Act, minor disputes between the Supreme Court and the Governor-General’s Council persisted.

Thus, the Act of Settlement 1781, was a critical step in consolidating British administration in India. By clearly defining the powers of the Supreme Court and emphasizing respect for local laws and customs, the Act reduced administrative confusion and established a more structured governance framework. It also set a precedent for integrating Indian legal traditions into the British judicial system, which continued to evolve in subsequent years.